Montanez v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Montanez v. Wright

781 P.2d 1273, 99 Or. App. 377

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 8, 1989

DocketCV88-629; CA A60458

StatusPublished

This text of 781 P.2d 1273 (Montanez v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montanez v. Wright, 781 P.2d 1273, 99 Or. App. 377 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his petition for habeas corpus relief. Because the trial court erred in entertaining a motion for summary judgment, Kinney v. Maass, 98 Or App 590, 779 P2d 632 (1989); see Bedell v. Scheidler, 307 Or 562, 566, 770 P2d 909 (1989); Lane v. Maass, 98 Or App 75, 778 P2d 503 (1989), we reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his petition for habeas corpus relief. Because the trial court erred in entertaining a motion for summary judgment, Kinney v. Maass, 98 Or App 590, 779 P2d 632 (1989); see Bedell v. Scheidler, 307 Or 562, 566, 770 P2d 909 (1989); Lane v. Maass, 98 Or App 75, 778 P2d 503 (1989), we reverse and remand.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

781 P.2d 1273, 99 Or. App. 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montanez-v-wright-orctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack