Montanez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Montanez v. State

586 So. 2d 295, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1206, 1991 WL 180418

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedJuly 26, 1991

DocketCR-90-799

StatusPublished

This text of 586 So. 2d 295 (Montanez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montanez v. State, 586 So. 2d 295, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1206, 1991 WL 180418 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Honorio Samuel Monta-nez, appeals from the denial of his Rule 20, Ala.R.Crim.P.Temp., petition (now Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P.). The State has filed a motion stating that it is unclear from the trial court’s order on what grounds it denied the appellant’s petition and moving that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County so that that court may make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp. We agree and remand this case to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Due return should be filed with this court within 90 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TAYLOR, Judge.

The appellant, Honorio Samuel Monta-nez, appeals from the denial of his Rule 20, Ala.R.Crim.P.Temp., petition (now Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P.). The State has filed a motion stating that it is unclear from the trial court’s order on what grounds it denied the appellant’s petition and moving that this cause be remanded to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County so that that court may make specific findings of fact as required by Rule 20.9(d), A.R.Crim.P.Temp. We agree and remand this case to the Circuit Court for Calhoun County for proceedings consistent with this opinion. Due return should be filed with this court within 90 days from the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

586 So. 2d 295, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1206, 1991 WL 180418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montanez-v-state-alacrimapp-1991.