Montana v. Wyoming

CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 20, 2018
Docket137, Orig
StatusPublished

This text of Montana v. Wyoming (Montana v. Wyoming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montana v. Wyoming, (U.S. 2018).

Opinion

Decree Judgment

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STATE OF MONTANA v. STATE OF WYOMING AND

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

ON BILL OF COMPLAINT No. 137, Orig. Decided February 20, 2018

The Report of the Special Master is received and or- dered filed. The proposed judgment and decree are en- tered: JUDGMENT Judgment is awarded against the State of Wyoming and in favor of the State of Montana for violations of the Yel- lowstone River Compact resulting from Wyoming’s reduc- tion of the volume of water available in the Tongue River at the Stateline between Wyoming and Montana by 1300 acre feet in 2004 and 56 acre feet in 2006. Judgment is awarded in the amount of $20,340, together with pre- judgment and post-judgment interest of seven percent (7%) per annum from the year of each violation until paid. Costs are awarded to Montana in the amount of $67,270.87. Wyoming shall pay these damages, interest, and costs in full not later than 90 days from the date of entry of this Judgment. Wyoming shall make its payment into an account specified by Montana to be used for improvements to the Tongue River Reservoir or related facilities in Mon- tana. Montana may distribute these funds to a state agency or program, a political subdivision of the State, a nonprofit corporation, association, and/or a charitable organization at the sole discretion of the Montana Attor- ney General in accordance with the laws of the State of Montana, with the express condition that the funds be used for improvements to the Tongue River Reservoir or related facilities in Montana. 2 MONTANA v. WYOMING

PerDecree Curiam

Except as herein provided, all claims in Montana’s Bill of Complaint are denied and dismissed with prejudice. DECREE A. General Provisions 1. Article V(A) of the Yellowstone River Compact (Com- pact) protects pre-1950 appropriative rights to the benefi- cial uses of water of the Yellowstone River System in Montana from diversions and withdrawals of surface water and groundwater in Wyoming, whether for direct use or storage, that are not made pursuant to appropriat- ive rights in Wyoming existing as of January 1, 1950. 2. Article V of the Compact, including the protections of Article V(A), applies to all surface waters tributary to the Tongue and Powder Rivers (with the exception of the explicit exclusions set out in Article V(E) of the Compact). 3. Article V(A) of the Compact does not guarantee Mon- tana a fixed quantity or flow of water, nor does it limit Wyoming to the net volume of water actually consumed in Wyoming prior to January 1, 1950. 4. Article V(A) of the Compact protects pre-1950 appro- priative rights only to the extent they are for “beneficial uses,” as defined in Article II(H) of the Compact, and are otherwise consistent with the doctrine of appropriation. In particular, pre-1950 rights are not protected to the extent they are wasteful under the doctrine of appropriation. 5. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Decree or the Compact, the laws of Montana and Wyoming (in- cluding rules for reservoir accounting) govern the admin- istration and management of each State’s respective water rights in the implementation of Article V(A) of the Compact. B. Calls 1. To protect pre-1950 appropriative rights under Ar- ticle V(A) of the Compact, Montana must place a call. Wyoming is not liable for flow or storage impacts that take Cite as: 583 U. S. ____ (2018) 3

Decree

place when a call is not in effect. 2. Subject to paragraph B(3), Montana may place a call on the Tongue River whenever (a) a pre-1950 direct flow right in Montana is not receiving the water to which it is entitled, or (b) Montana reasonably believes, based on substantial evidence, that the Tongue River Reservoir might not fill before the end of the water year. 3. Montana cannot place a call under Article V(A) when it can remedy shortages of pre-1950 appropriators in Montana through purely intrastate means that do not prejudice Montana’s other rights under the Compact. 4. A call need not take any particular form, use any specific language, or be delivered by or to any particular official, but should be sufficient to place Wyoming on clear notice that Montana needs additional water to satisfy its pre-1950 appropriative rights. 5. A call is effective upon receipt by Wyoming and con- tinues in effect until Montana notifies Wyoming that Montana is lifting the call. 6. Montana shall promptly notify Wyoming that it is lifting a call when (a) pre-1950 direct flow rights in Mon- tana are receiving the water to which they are entitled, and (b) Montana reasonably believes, based on substantial evidence, that the Tongue River Reservoir will fill before the end of the water year. Montana may place a new call at a later date if the conditions of paragraph B(2) are again met. 7. Upon receiving a call, Wyoming shall promptly initi- ate action to ensure, to the degree physically possible, that only pre-1950 appropriators in Wyoming are diverting or storing surface water and only to the degree permitted by their appropriative rights and this Decree. Wyoming also shall promptly initiate any action needed to ensure, to the degree physically possible, that any groundwater withdrawals under post-January 1, 1950 appropriative rights are not interfering with the continued enjoyment of 4 MONTANA v. WYOMING

pre-1950 surface rights in Montana. Wyoming shall be liable for diversions, storage, or withdrawals in violation of Article V(A) of the Compact even if it was not physically possible for Wyoming to prevent the diversions, storage, or withdrawals during a call (including depletions caused by groundwater withdrawals occurring before the call). Where it is initially not physically possible to prevent the storage of water in violation of Article V(A), Wyoming shall deliver such water to Montana as soon as it is physi- cally possible to do so after a request from Montana. C. Pre-1950 Appropriative Rights 1. The Compact assigns the same seniority level to all pre-1950 water users in Montana and Wyoming. Except as otherwise provided in this Decree, the exercise of pre- 1950 appropriative rights in Wyoming does not violate the Compact rights of pre-1950 appropriative rights in Montana. 2. Article V(A) does not prohibit Montana or Wyoming from allowing a pre-1950 appropriator to conserve water through the adoption of improved irrigation techniques and then use that water to irrigate the lands to which the specific pre-1950 appropriative right attaches, even when the increased consumption interferes with pre-1950 uses in Montana. Article V(A) protects pre-1950 appropriators in Montana from the use of such conserved water in Wyo- ming on new lands or for new purposes. Such uses fall within Article V(B) of the Compact and cannot interfere with pre-1950 appropriative rights in Montana. 3. Pre-1950 appropriators in Montana and Wyoming may change their place of use, type of use, and point of diversion pursuant to applicable state law, so long as any such changes do not injure appropriators in the other States as evaluated at the time of the change. D. Wyoming Storage Reservoirs 1. Post-January 1, 1950 appropriators in Wyoming may Cite as: 583 U. S. ____ (2018) 5

not store water when Montana has issued a call, except as provided in paragraph B(7) of this Decree. Post-January 1, 1950 appropriators in Wyoming may store water during periods when a call is not in effect. 2. Water stored under post-January 1, 1950 appropriat- ive rights in Wyoming when a call is not in effect has been legally stored under the Compact and can be subsequently used at any time, including when pre-1950 appropriative rights in Montana are unsatisfied. The Compact does not require Wyoming to release such water to Montana in response to a call. E. Tongue River Reservoir 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Montana v. Wyoming, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montana-v-wyoming-scotus-2018.