Montana Columbian Club v. Ketcham, Rotschild & Co.

54 Ill. App. 334, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 113
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 18, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Ill. App. 334 (Montana Columbian Club v. Ketcham, Rotschild & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montana Columbian Club v. Ketcham, Rotschild & Co., 54 Ill. App. 334, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 113 (Ill. Ct. App. 1894).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gary

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The deputy sheriff served the summons against the appellant by delivering a copy “ to E. B. Duncan, the agent of said club.”

The appellant filed affidavits that Duncan was not “ agent,” and stating who the officers of the club were, and where they might have been found, and moved to vacate a judgment by default which had been entered, and quash the summons. Inadvertently the name California had been used for Montana in the original return and the court permitted a correction by amendment of the return.

The truth of the sheriff’s return can not be questioned by motion. It must be done by plea in abatement. Union Nat. Bk. v. First Nat. Bk., 90 Ill. 56.

No application for leave to plead was made, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union National Bank v. First National Bank
90 Ill. 56 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Ill. App. 334, 1894 Ill. App. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montana-columbian-club-v-ketcham-rotschild-co-illappct-1894.