Montalvo v. State

786 S.W.2d 710, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 217, 1989 WL 153100
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 20, 1989
Docket1482-89
StatusPublished
Cited by36 cases

This text of 786 S.W.2d 710 (Montalvo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montalvo v. State, 786 S.W.2d 710, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 217, 1989 WL 153100 (Tex. 1989).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Applicant was convicted of murder in Cause No. 88-CR-0159 in the 289th Judicial District Court of Bexar County. Punishment was assessed at confinement for forty (40) years in the Texas Department of Corrections. A decision by the San Antonio Court of Appeals has reversed that conviction and remanded the case to the trial court. Montalvo v. State, No. 04-88-00392-CR (Tex.App.—San Antonio, delivered October 4, 1989). The State has filed a petition for discretionary review with this Court. The petition is pending before this Court.

Applicant has applied to this Court, pursuant to Article 44.04(h) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to set a reasonable bail pending final determination of the appeal. *711 In his motion for bail, applicant notes that the criteria for bail are established by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 11 of the Texas Constitution, and Articles 1.07 and 17.15 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Applicant sets out the factors which have developed from these provisions: 1

1. Nature of offense;
2. Ability to make bail;
3. Prior criminal record;
4. Conformity with previous bond conditions;
5. Employment record;
6. Family ties to community;
7. Length of residence in community;

Applicant then thoroughly details how he meets these criteria.

While consideration of each of these itemized factors is not required, nor is the list necessarily exhaustive of factors that might be germain in a particular case under 44.04(h), we find that under the facts of this case the allegations in his motion support a setting of bail as requested.

Accordingly, bail is hereby set in the amount of $25,000.00, and it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court order the appellant released from confinement assessed in this cause upon the posting of said bail by sureties approved by the trial court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

1

. Also a consideration in bail cases, although not applicable in this case, is the recent amendment to the Texas Constitution concerning the rights of crime victims, Art. 1, Sec. 30, which includes the right of the victim to be reasonably protected from the accused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bell, Orlando
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2021
Jeremy David Spielbauer v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
Danny Wayne Alcoser v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
Taylor v. State
564 S.W.3d 501 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018)
Nathan Ray Foreman v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2018
Ingerson, Fred Earl Iii
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2017
Owings, Richard Charles Jr.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2017
Odom, Stephen Demond
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2016
Gaubatz, David West
Texas Supreme Court, 2015
Garcia, Paul Anthony
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2015
Gaubatz, David West
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
Gentry, Samuel C.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2015
Samuel C. Gentry v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015
McKinney, Raymond
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014
Reeves, Frank Edward
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014
Frank Edward Reeves v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014
Bonds, Michael Ray
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012
Moulton, David Len
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012
Barshaw, Mark David
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2011
Grant, Derrick Dwayne
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
786 S.W.2d 710, 1989 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 217, 1989 WL 153100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montalvo-v-state-texcrimapp-1989.