Montalvo v. State Department of Environmental Regulation

667 So. 2d 816, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1995·No. Nos. 94-1898, 94-1921, and 94-1930·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s decision finding no insurance coverage under these various general comprehensive liability policies for a regulatory agency’s action for environmental pollution. We agree that the pollution exclusion clauses in these policies preclude coverage. See Dimmitt Chevrolet, Inc. v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins. Corp., 636 So.2d 700 (Fla.1993); Leek v. Reliance Ins. Co., 486 So.2d 701 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Titan Corp. v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co., 22 Cal.App.4th 457, 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 476 (1994).

AFFIRMED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montalvo v. State Department of Environmental Regulation, 667 So. 2d 816, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

667 So. 2d 816 (Montalvo v. State Department of Environmental Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leek v. Reliance Ins. Co.
486 So. 2d 701 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Dimmitt Chevrolet v. Southeastern Fidelity
636 So. 2d 700 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Titan Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
22 Cal. App. 4th 457 (California Court of Appeal, 1994)