Montalvo v. Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund
967 So. 2d 369, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16313, 2007 WL 3010154
Opinion
The appellant seeks review of an order denying her motion to dissolve an injunction and/or lis pendens. On the undisputed record before us, we cannot conclude that the order constitutes an abuse of discretion. See Georgia Banking Co. v. GMC Lending Mortgage Servs. Corp., 923 So.2d 1224 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Vargas v. Vargas, 771 So.2d 594 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Castillo v. Vlaminck de Castillo, 701 So.2d 1198 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Chiusolo v. Kennedy, 614 So.2d 491 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Montalvo v. Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund, 967 So. 2d 369, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 16313, 2007 WL 3010154 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
967 So. 2d 369 (Montalvo v. Attorneys' Title Insurance Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chiusolo v. Kennedy
614 So. 2d 491 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Vargas v. Vargas
771 So. 2d 594 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Castillo v. Vlaminck De Castillo
701 So. 2d 1198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Georgia Banking Co. v. GMC LENDING & MORTG.
923 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)