Montalet v. Murray
This text of 8 U.S. 46 (Montalet v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court was unanimously of opinion, that the courts of the United States have no jurisdiction of cases between aliens.
Key then suggested, that perhaps it did not sufficiently appear upon the record, that the original parties to the notes were aliens ; But—
Marshall, Ch. J., said, that if it did not appear upon the record, that the character of the original parties would support the jurisdiction, that objection was equally fatal, under the uniform decisions of this court.
Judgment reversed, for want of jurisdiction, and with costs, under the authority of Winchester v. Jackson (3 Cr. 514).
*30 But on the last day of the term, The Court gave the following general directions to the clerk. That in cases of reversal, costs do not go, of course, but in all cases of affirmance, they do. And that when a judgment is reversed, for want of jurisdiction, it must be, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 U.S. 46, 2 L. Ed. 545, 4 Cranch 46, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montalet-v-murray-scotus-1807.