Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Montalban v. State

Montalban v. State

709 So. 2d 1386, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5888
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 27, 1998
DocketNos. 96-3385 to 96-3387, 97-304
StatusPublished

This text of 709 So. 2d 1386 (Montalban v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montalban v. State, 709 So. 2d 1386, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5888 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arquimendes Montalban, Enrique Mendez, Rolando Gonzalez and Antonio Rodriguez appeal their convictions and sentences for burglary with assault or battery without a firearm, three counts of false imprisonment and one count of petty theft. We affirm.

After careful consideration, we find that the appellants’ contentions regarding the use of hearsay exceptions, the denial of preemp-tory challenges, and the content of the prosecutor’s closing argument do not constitute reversible error. Even if error occurred it was harmless in nature. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
709 So. 2d 1386, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 5888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montalban-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.