Montague v. Worstell

New York Marine Court

Montague v. Worstell

55 How. Pr. 406

DecidedMay 15, 1878

StatusPublished

This text of 55 How. Pr. 406 (Montague v. Worstell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Marine Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Montague v. Worstell, 55 How. Pr. 406 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

McAdam, J.

The materiality of the evidence is shown, and all of the statutory requirements have been complied with (3 R. S. [6th ed.], p. 652), and I would willingly make the order were it not for the fact that the statutory provision in question has been expressly repealed by the act of 1877 (chap. 417, sec. 3), and the ease is not embraced in any provision of the new Code of Civil Procedure (sec. 872, subd. 5) because the person to be examined is a party to the action. [407]*407The application will therefore be denied with costs. Under the new Code any person can be examined conditionally before trial at the instance of either party to a suit. A party to an action cannot, however, be thus examined, excepting at the instance of the adverse party. So that, in case there is danger of a party dying before trial, there is no means of perpetuating his testimony, no matter how important such testimony may be.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McAdam, J.

The materiality of the evidence is shown, and all of the statutory requirements have been complied with (3 R. S. [6th ed.], p. 652), and I would willingly make the order were it not for the fact that the statutory provision in question has been expressly repealed by the act of 1877 (chap. 417, sec. 3), and the ease is not embraced in any provision of the new Code of Civil Procedure (sec. 872, subd. 5) because the person to be examined is a party to the action. [407]*407The application will therefore be denied with costs. Under the new Code any person can be examined conditionally before trial at the instance of either party to a suit. A party to an action cannot, however, be thus examined, excepting at the instance of the adverse party. So that, in case there is danger of a party dying before trial, there is no means of perpetuating his testimony, no matter how important such testimony may be.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 How. Pr. 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montague-v-worstell-nymarct-1878.