Montague v. Reakert
This text of 69 Ky. 393 (Montague v. Reakert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion oe the court.
After the dissolution, and notice of it to the appellees, Parker had no authority to bind his former co-partner Montague by the note in the firm name, even though executed for a firm debt. The law implies in such a case no authority, and the testimony clearly negatives any express authority; consequently the verdict and judgment against Montague were unauthorized and erroneous, and the court ought to have sustained the motion for a new [394]*394trial. This opinion may not affect Montague’s pre-existing liability on the open account.
Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and tbe cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 Ky. 393, 6 Bush 393, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montague-v-reakert-kyctapp-1869.