Montague v. Reakert

69 Ky. 393, 6 Bush 393, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 164
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided January 7, 1869·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

JUDGE ROBERTSON

delivered the opinion oe the court.

After the dissolution, and notice of it to the appellees, Parker had no authority to bind his former co-partner Montague by the note in the firm name, even though executed for a firm debt. The law implies in such a case no authority, and the testimony clearly negatives any express authority; consequently the verdict and judgment against Montague were unauthorized and erroneous, and the court ought to have sustained the motion for a new [394] trial. This opinion may not affect Montague’s pre-existing liability on the open account.

Wherefore the judgment is reversed, and tbe cause remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montague v. Reakert, 69 Ky. 393, 6 Bush 393, 1869 Ky. LEXIS 164 (Ky. Ct. App. 1869).

69 Ky. 393 (Montague v. Reakert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terrell v. Rowland
4 S.W. 825 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1887)
Fields v. Barnes
9 Ky. Op. 761 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1877)
Pace v. H. B. Claflin & Co.
8 Ky. Op. 706 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1876)