Montague v. Director of Revenue

77 S.W.3d 735, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1454, 2002 WL 1365546
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 25, 2002
DocketNo. ED 80152
StatusPublished

This text of 77 S.W.3d 735 (Montague v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Montague v. Director of Revenue, 77 S.W.3d 735, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1454, 2002 WL 1365546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue (hereinafter, “Director”) appeals the trial court’s judgment in setting aside the one year denial of Marcus Montague’s (hereinafter, “Driver”) driving privileges. Director claims the trial court erred in setting aside the denial because Driver failed to present sufficient evidence to rebut Director’s pri-ma facie case that Driver’s blood alcohol content was at least .02% while he was driving.

[736]*736We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript and find the trial court’s decision was supported by substantial evidence on the record. Meyer v. Director of Revenue, 34 S.W.3d 230 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meyer v. Director of Revenue
34 S.W.3d 230 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.W.3d 735, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1454, 2002 WL 1365546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montague-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2002.