Montague v. Conroy

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7064

HORACE MONTAGUE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden, Maryland House of Correction-Annex; BURLIE FRINK, Head of Security, Maryland House of Correction-Annex; JOHN DOE, Head of Records, Maryland House of Correction-Annex,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-3191-AW)

Submitted: August 23, 2006 Decided: September 8, 2006

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bert Walter Kapinus, Hyattsville, Maryland, for Appellant. Glen William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Horace Montague appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Montague v.

Conroy, No. CA-03-3191-AW (D. Md. June 17, 2005). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -