Montagnino v. Fiala

106 A.D.3d 1090, 966 N.Y.S.2d 161
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 29, 2013·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Froceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Administrative Appeals Board dated October 25, 2011, confirming a determination of an administrative law judge dated February 15, 2011, which, after a hearing, found that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146 and suspended his driver’s license for one year.

Adjudged that the determination dated October 25, 2011, is [1091]*1091confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the finding that he violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146 by failing to exercise due care to avoid striking a pedestrian is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Cervoni v Commissioner of N.Y. State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 96 AD3d 742, 743 [2012]; Matter of Guarino v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs., 80 AD3d 697, 698 [2011]; Matter of Fazzone v Adduci, 155 AD2d 540, 541 [1989]). The evidence presented at the hearing demonstrated that the petitioner turned left out of a parking space and fatally struck a pedestrian he did not see before his vehicle struck her.

Under the circumstances of this case, and considering the petitioner’s driving record, the one-year license suspension imposed was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (see Matter of Kreisler v New York City Tr. Auth., 2 NY3d 775, 776 [2004]; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 233 [1974]; Matter of Martin v Adduci, 138 AD2d 599, 600 [1988]).

The petitioner’s remaining contention is without merit. Angiolillo, J.E, Chambers, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Montagnino v. Fiala, 106 A.D.3d 1090, 966 N.Y.S.2d 161 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

106 A.D.3d 1090 (Montagnino v. Fiala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Hunt v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehicles
2019 NY Slip Op 5531 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Friedman v. Fiala
2018 NY Slip Op 3677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Sadallah v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.
2018 NY Slip Op 3036 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Clapp v. Fiala
2018 NY Slip Op 2778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Franco v. Fiala
2017 NY Slip Op 1638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
SmithvStateofNewYork
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Smith v. State
121 A.D.3d 1358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Chu v. Fiala
117 A.D.3d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Failing v. Fiala
111 A.D.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)