Montag Bros. v. State Revenue Commission
186 S.E. 558, 182 Ga. 568, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 496
This text of 186 S.E. 558 (Montag Bros. v. State Revenue Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Montag Bros. v. State Revenue Commission, 186 S.E. 558, 182 Ga. 568, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 496 (Ga. 1936).
Opinion
Upon careful consideration of the application for certiorari and of the entire record, this court is of the opinion that the Court of Appeals did not err in affirming the judgment of the superior court finding against the affidavit of illegality interposed by the plaintiff in error. Therefore the judgment of the Court of Appeals must be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Health Horizons, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
521 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
International Business MacHines Corp. v. Evans
99 S.E.2d 220 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1957)
Redwine v. United States Tobacco Co.
75 S.E.2d 556 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
El Dorado Oil Works v. McColgan
215 P.2d 4 (California Supreme Court, 1950)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
186 S.E. 558, 182 Ga. 568, 1936 Ga. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/montag-bros-v-state-revenue-commission-ga-1936.