Mont. Board of Nat. Resources v. Mo
This text of Mont. Board of Nat. Resources v. Mo (Mont. Board of Nat. Resources v. Mo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 12889
I N THE SUPREME COURT O THE STATE OF M N A A F OTN
M N A A BOARD OF NATURAL RESOURCES e t a 1 OTN ., P l a i n t i f f s and A p p e l l a n t s ,
THE M N A A P W R COMPANY, a Corpora t i o n , OTN O E
Defendants and Respondents.
Appeal from: D i s t r i c t Court of t h e F i r s t J u d i c i a l District, Honorable P e t e r Meloy, J u d g e p r e s i d i n g .
Counsel of Record:
For Appellants :
Donald D. MacIntyre a r g u e d , H e l e n a , Montana
F o r Respondents:
Thomas K e l l e y a r g u e d , B i l l i n g s , Montana William C o l d i r o n a r g u e d , B u t t e , Montana John C a r l a p p e a r e d , B u t t e , Montana
Submitted: November 1 2 , 1974 > i Decided : ~ , E L 5. ,. ?- , - ' . " -I, 4 3?
Filed : rEK CIJRIAM:
O October 2 3 , 1974 p l a i n t i f f s , p u r s u a n t t o Rule 40, Elontana n R u l e s of A p p e l l a t e C i v i l P r o c e d u r e , a p p l i e d t o t h i s Court s e e k i n g
r e i n s t a t e m e n t of a n i n j u n c t i o n which had been d i s s o l v e d by t h e
d i s t r i c t c o u r t o f Lewis and C l a r k County, pending a p p e a l and f i n a l decisi~nby t h i s C o u r t . The c o n t r o v e r s y h e r e a r o s e a s f o l l o w s :
On .June 1 4 , 1974 p l a i n t i f f s i n s t i t u t e d t h i s a c t i o n , C i v i l
Cause No. 37972 i n t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , by f i l i n g a c o m p l a i n t f o r d e c l a r a t o r y judgmen~ and i n j u n c t i o n a g a i n s t d e f e n d a n t . Plaintiffs sought a r u l i n g d e c l a r i n g d e f e n d a n t ' s proposed 230 L i l o v o l t trans
m i s s i o n l i n e from B i l l i n g s t o G r e a t F a l l s , Montana, (the l i n e ) , s u b j e c t t~ t h e Montana U t i l i t y S i t i n g Act o f 1973, s e c t i o n s 70-
801-70-823, R.C.M. 1947, and an o r d e r t e r m p o r a r i l y r e s t r a i n i n g d e f e n d a n t from c o n s t r u c t i n g t h e l i n e . D i s t r i c t Judge P e t e r G. yieloy i s s u e d t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r and s e t a show c a u s e h e a r i n g on t h e m a t t e r . On J u l y 3 , 1974 d e f e n d a n t answered t h e c o m p l a i n t s t a t i n g t h e Tine was u n d e r c o n s t r u c t i o n p r i o r t o J a n u a r y 1, 1973 and t h e r e f o r e
w a s s p e c i f i c a l l y exempt from t h e Montana U t i l i t y S i t i n g Act under
s e c t i o n 70-811 o f t h a t Act. An e v i d e n t i a r y h c a r i n g was h e l d t h e same day. The p a r t i e s were g i v e n a d d i t i o n a l t i m e t o f i l e f u r t h e r b r i e f s .
On September 4 , 1974 Judge Meloy found t h a t t h e l i n e was
w i t h i n t h e e x c e p t i o n p r o v i d e d by s e c t i o n 7Q-811, R.C.M. 1947, and d ~ m c l u d e dt h a t t h e temporary r e s t r a i n i n g o r d e r s h o u l d b e d i s s o l v e d . j c c o r d i n g l y , judgment i n f a v o r o f d e f e n d a n t and a g a i n s t p l - a i n t i f f s d a s e n t e r e d on September 26, 1974. On October 4 , 1974 p l a i n t i f f s f i l e d a n o t i c e of a p p e a l and
moved t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t u n d e r Rule 7 ( a ) , Montana Rules of A p p e l l a t e C i v i l P r o c e d u r e , t o s t a y e x e c u t i o n of t h e judgment. This :[lotion was d e n i e d on October 7 , 1974, whereupon p l a i n t i f f s made d p p l i c a t i o n t o t h i s Court.
By an o r d e r d a t e d October 24, 1974, t h i s Court s e t t h e m a t t e r f o r a d v e r s a r y h e a r i n g on November 12, 1974. Hearing was had, and a f t e r examining t h e r e c o r d and consideri.ng t h e arguments of both p a r t i e s , t h i s Court f i n d s , a s d i d t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t , a t o t a l absence of f a c t s i n t h e r e c o r d t o support p l a i n t i f f s r a l l e g a t i o n s t h a t discontinuance of t h e injunction w i l l r e s u l t i n i r r e p a r a b l e injury . The r e l i e f sought i s t h e r e f o r e D E N I E D .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mont. Board of Nat. Resources v. Mo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mont-board-of-nat-resources-v-mo-mont-1974.