Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Quest Group

Federal Circuit

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Quest Group

210 F. App'x 993

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 13, 2006·No. Nos. 06-1111, 06-1112·Published

Opinion

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

On the basis of District Judge Patel’s thorough claim construction, Monster Cable Prods., Inc. v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 18, 2005), and her comprehensive analysis of the infringement issues, both literal and under the doctrine of equivalents, Monster Cable Prods., Inc. v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005, 2005 WL 1875466 (N.D.Cal. Aug.8, 2005), and after considering the parties’ briefs and arguments, we affirm the appealed judgment of the district court in all respects. In addition, we affirm the district court’s rulings on the issues raised in the cross-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLAGER, Senior Circuit Judge.

On the basis of District Judge Patel’s thorough claim construction, Monster Cable Prods., Inc. v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005 (N.D.Cal. Mar. 18, 2005), and her comprehensive analysis of the infringement issues, both literal and under the doctrine of equivalents, Monster Cable Prods., Inc. v. The Quest Group, No. 04-0005, 2005 WL 1875466 (N.D.Cal. Aug.8, 2005), and after considering the parties’ briefs and arguments, we affirm the appealed judgment of the district court in all respects. In addition, we affirm the district court’s rulings on the issues raised in the cross-appeal.

Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Quest Group, 210 F. App'x 993 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

210 F. App'x 993 (Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Quest Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.