Monssef Cheneau v. Jeffrey Rosen
983 F.3d 1077
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 6, 2021·No. 15-70636·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MONSSEF CHENEAU, No. 15-70636
Petitioner, Agency No. A077-279-939
v. ORDER JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General,
Respondent.
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monssef Cheneau v. Jeffrey Rosen, 983 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2021).
983 F.3d 1077 (Monssef Cheneau v. Jeffrey Rosen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Environmental Center, et al. v. Douglas Burgum, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, et al.
D. Alaska, 2026
Klamath Forest Alliance, et al. v. Tara Jones, et al.
E.D. California, 2025
Wild Horse Education v. United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management
D. Nevada, 2024
Friends of the Crazy Mountains v. Mary Erickson
Ninth Circuit, 2024
Wilderness Society v. Haaland
District of Columbia, 2024
National Audubon Society v. Haaland
D. Alaska, 2023
Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. Bureau of Land Management
D. Oregon, 2022
(PS) Jackson v. Josiah
E.D. California, 2021