Monssef Cheneau v. Jeffrey Rosen

Ninth Circuit

Monssef Cheneau v. Jeffrey Rosen

983 F.3d 1077

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 6, 2021

Docket15-70636

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 983 F.3d 1077 (Monssef Cheneau v. Jeffrey Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monssef Cheneau v. Jeffrey Rosen, 983 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 6 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MONSSEF CHENEAU, No. 15-70636

Petitioner, Agency No. A077-279-939

v. ORDER JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI