Monses v. State

78 Ga. 110
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 9, 1886·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

The court charged the jury that if the accused was the owner of a tippling-house, and if he kept it open but a moment on the Sabbath day, for any purpose, he is guilty. This charge is assigned as error, and is the main ground relied on here by the plaintiff in error. Under the statute, a tippling-house must be closed on the Sabbath day, and if the owner keep it open but for a moment, it is a violation of the statute; and there is no purpose for which the statute authorizes such a house to be opened. The charge of the court being right, the exception thereto falls. The verdict is amply sustained by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monses v. State, 78 Ga. 110 (Ga. 1886).

78 Ga. 110 (Monses v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniel Corp. v. Reed
732 S.E.2d 61 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2012)
State v. Woodward
69 S.E. 385 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1910)
Richardson v. State
59 S.E. 916 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Lingelbach v. Hobson
107 N.W. 168 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
McCarty v. City or Atlanta
49 S.E. 287 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Mohrman v. State
43 L.R.A. 398 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Williams v. State
39 L.R.A. 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1897)