Monserrate v. Valls

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Monserrate v. Valls

7 P.R. 427

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedNovember 4, 1904

DocketNo. 52

StatusPublished

This text of 7 P.R. 427 (Monserrate v. Valls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monserrate v. Valls, 7 P.R. 427 (prsupreme 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice MacLeary

delivered the opinion of the court.

The applicants in this case do not show themselves to be parties interested in this matter in such a way as to qualify them to present a petition for mandamus, and the writ was for that reason properly denied. Reference may be had to the [428]*428case of Casalduc, just decided, for a sufficient discussion of tire only question involved.

Tlie judgment of the District Court of Guayama is correct and should he affirmed.

Affirmed.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernández, Figueras, and Wolf concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice MacLeary

delivered the opinion of the court.

The applicants in this case do not show themselves to be parties interested in this matter in such a way as to qualify them to present a petition for mandamus, and the writ was for that reason properly denied. Reference may be had to the [428]*428case of Casalduc, just decided, for a sufficient discussion of tire only question involved.

Tlie judgment of the District Court of Guayama is correct and should he affirmed.

Affirmed.

Chief Justice Quiñones and Justices Hernández, Figueras, and Wolf concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 P.R. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monserrate-v-valls-prsupreme-1904.