Monserrat Lopez v. Adidas America, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided April 23, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00447·Unknown

Opinion

1 MONSERRAT LOPEZ, an individual, on Case No. 2:21-cv-00447 MCS (PVCx) behalf of herself, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, v. Complaint Filed: December 4, 2020 ADIDAS AMERICA, INC., an Oregon corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Defendants. Sm

1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS OF STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. ° Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section XIII, below, that this Stipulated i Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal.

Il. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve the disclosure of material protected under the constitutional, statutory, or common law right to privacy or protected as confidential business, financial, proprietary, or private personnel, policy and payroll information. Such confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential information regarding current and/ or former employees, 91 confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over 97 confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are 2g || entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable

necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing beso designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. III. DEFINITIONS A. Action: Action refers to the above referenced matter titled Monserrat Lopez v. Adidas America, Inc., Case No. 2:21-cv-00447-MCS (PVCx). B. Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. C. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information that has not been made public or is not otherwise available or accessible in the public domain and that concerns or relates to the confidential or proprietary information of: (1) Defendant adidas America, Inc. (“Defendant”); (2) Plaintiff Monserrat Lopez (‘Plaintiff’); or (3) any third parties, the disclosure of which information is likely to have the effect of causing harm to the competitive position of Defendant or to the organization or person from whom the information was obtained, or to the parties’ privacy. Confidential Information also includes private information pertaining to Defendant’s or a third party’s employees, for which Defendant or a third party has a duty to maintain the confidentiality of such information. Information designated Confidential may be used only in connection with this proceeding, and not for any other purpose. Such information may not be disclosed to anyone except as provided in this Order. D. Counsel: “Counsel” means: 1) Littler Mendelson, a professional corporation, and its respective

support staff and other employees who are not employed by a Party and to whom it is necessary to disclose Confidential Information for the purpose of this action; 2) JCL Law Firm, and their respective support staff and other employees who are not employed by a Party and to whom it is necessary to disclose Confidential Information for the purpose of this action; 3) Zakay Law Group, and their respective support staff and other employees who are not employed by a Party and to whom it is necessary to disclose Confidential Information for the purpose of this action; E. Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” F. Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. G. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. H. House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. I. Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. J. Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to Pe

this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. K. Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). L. Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. M. Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. N. Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” O. Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. IV. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. V. DURATION Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the court-filed information to be introduced that was previously designated as confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of the public,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monserrat Lopez v. Adidas America, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Monserrat Lopez v. Adidas America, Inc. (Monserrat Lopez v. Adidas America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)