Monsell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
This text of 173 A.D. 902 (Monsell v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order of the City Court of Yonkers reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that the greater weight of the evidence established that the insured had had consumption prior to the date of the policy in suit, and had been treated by a physician for such serious disease, and was then not in souud health, but was suffering from said disease. We do not decide that the testimony of the witnesses Dobbs and Trotter would haye been competent if properly [903]*903objected to. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.D. 902, 157 N.Y.S. 1136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monsell-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1916.