Monsanto Chemical Works v. Jaeger

42 F.2d 1018, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4408
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 19, 1930
DocketNo. 4173
StatusPublished

This text of 42 F.2d 1018 (Monsanto Chemical Works v. Jaeger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monsanto Chemical Works v. Jaeger, 42 F.2d 1018, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4408 (3d Cir. 1930).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issues in this case grew out of a controversy which arose over certain agreements called “option and purchase agreements,” wherein the defendants gave options to the plaintiff to purchase certain new processes and contact masses for the manufacture of sulphuric acid and phthalie anhydryde;

The learned District Judge, in a very careful and comprehensive opinion [31 F.(2d) 188], disposed of the issues involved without error, and we affirm the decree on his opinion, except as to eosts, as to which the decree is modified. Plaintiffs shall pay one-third and defendants two-thirds of the costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monsanto Chemical Works v. Jaeger
31 F.2d 188 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 F.2d 1018, 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 4408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monsanto-chemical-works-v-jaeger-ca3-1930.