Monrose v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Monrose v. Florida Industrial Commission

190 So. 2d 571

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 1966

DocketNo. 35545

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 2d 571 (Monrose v. Florida Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monrose v. Florida Industrial Commission, 190 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commisssion bearing date May 19, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the records and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. ■

The petitions for certiorari and for attorney’s fees are therefore denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI