Monroe v. Winslow

254 A.D. 811, 5 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7710
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 1938·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Submitted controversy determined in favor of defendants, without costs. Memorandum: Although the stipulated facts do not contain a statement that the decedent died intestate, the chart or family tree annexed thereto and made a part thereof describes the decedent as the “ intestate,” and we accept that as a part of the stipulation. Decedent left no brothers or sisters or any descendants of such. Under these circumstances we decide that the plaintiff and all four defendants share the decedent’s estate equally, per capita. (Decedent Estate Law, § 83, subds. 6, 10. See, also, Matter of Davenport, 172 N. Y. 454, 459.) All concur. (Submitted controversy to determine persons entitled to share in an estate.) Present —- Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monroe v. Winslow, 254 A.D. 811, 5 N.Y.S.2d 640, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7710 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

254 A.D. 811 (Monroe v. Winslow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Techlease, Inc. v. Royal Insurance of America
149 A.D.2d 582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re the Estate of Battell
173 Misc. 273 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)