Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Monroe v. State

Monroe v. State

802 So. 2d 441, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17433, 2001 WL 1575662
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Monroe v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 760 So. 2d 289 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 12, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2795·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As acknowledged by the State, the written judgement which reflects that the defendant was convicted of a third degree felony, in connection with the theft offense, must be corrected to reflect that the conviction was for a misdemeanor, to-wit: Petit Theft. Accordingly, and solely to accomplish the foregoing, this cause is remanded to the trial court.

In all other respects, the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monroe v. State, 802 So. 2d 441, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17433, 2001 WL 1575662 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

802 So. 2d 441 (Monroe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.