Monroe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Monroe v. State

476 So. 2d 279, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2285, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16152

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 4, 1985

DocketNo. 84-2782

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 476 So. 2d 279 (Monroe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monroe v. State, 476 So. 2d 279, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2285, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16152 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

OTT, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant Vaughn Monroe appeals his judgments and sentences for trafficking in heroin and possession of cocaine. We affirm.

Appellant was sentenced as an habitual offender under section 772.084, Florida Statutes (1983). While this appeal was pending, the prior conviction used to enhance appellant’s sentence was set aside. The sentence was proper when imposed. We believe appellant should raise this issue in the trial court by a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Randolf v. State, 360 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Appellant’s judgments and sentences are AFFIRMED.

CAMPBELL and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI