Monroe v. State

104 So. 2d 734

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 25, 1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to King v. State, 104 So.2d 730, and is controlled by the principles of law enunciated therein.

Accordingly, certiorari is granted and the order here reviewed is quashed with directions to remand the cause to the trial court for a new trial.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., and LOPEZ, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Rehearing Granted

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to King v. State, 104 So.2d 730, and is controlled by the principles of law enunciated therein.

Accordingly, certiorari is granted and the order here reviewed is quashed with directions to remand the cause to the trial court for a new trial.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., and LOPEZ, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Monroe v. State, 104 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 1957).

Pincite

104 So. 2d 734 (Monroe v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.