Monroe v. Scott
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-20208 Summary Calendar
LUCRECIA LYNN MONROE, a/k/a Lucretia Lynn Monroe,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEP’T OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-3747 - - - - - - - - - - May 5, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lucrecia Lynn Monroe, Texas prisoner #422039, appeals from
the dismissal of her prisoner’s civil rights action for failure
to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
Monroe contends that prison officials violated the Due Process
and Equal Protection Clauses by depriving her of access to $25 in
her prison trust fund account while her trust fund was under
hold.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-20208 -2-
Regarding Monroe’s due process contention, we have reviewed
the record and the briefs of the parties and we find Monroe’s
contention frivolous for essentially the same reasons relied upon
by the district court. Regarding Monroe’s equal protection
contention, the hold on Monroe’s trust fund was rationally
related to a legitimate state interest in preserving Monroe’s
funds until forfeiture proceedings were completed. There was no
equal protection violation. Johnson v. Rodriguez, 110 F.3d 299,
306 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 559 (1997).
The district court denied Monroe’s current action for
failure to state a claim. The district court previously
dismissed as frivolous a civil action brought by Monroe. Because
we dismiss the current appeal as frivolous, Monroe may not
proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in civil actions or appeals
unless she is under imminent danger of serious physical harm. 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g).
APPEAL DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monroe v. Scott (Monroe v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.