Monroe v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Monroe v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 465, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 720

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 14, 1941·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

On writ of error we review judgment in favor of defendant on demurrer sustained to an original and to a first, second and third amended declaration.

Neither declaration is sufficient in its'allegations to state a cause of actionable negligence against the defendant.

Judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On writ of error we review judgment in favor of defendant on demurrer sustained to an original and to a first, second and third amended declaration.

Neither declaration is sufficient in its'allegations to state a cause of actionable negligence against the defendant.

Judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Monroe v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 465, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 720 (Fla. 1941).

Pincite

199 So. 763 (Monroe v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.