Monroe v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 465, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 720
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 1941
StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 763 (Monroe v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monroe v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 465, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 720 (Fla. 1941).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

On writ of error we review judgment in favor of defendant on demurrer sustained to an original and to a first, second and third amended declaration.

Neither declaration is sufficient in its'allegations to state a cause of actionable negligence against the defendant.

Judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford, Thomas and Adams, J. J., concur. Justices Whitfield, Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 763, 145 Fla. 465, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-v-railway-express-agency-inc-fla-1941.