Monroe v. Monroe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Monroe v. Monroe

55 A.D.2d 929, 391 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10186

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 55 A.D.2d 929 (Monroe v. Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monroe v. Monroe, 55 A.D.2d 929, 391 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for divorce, in which the defendant husband counterclaimed for divorce, (1) plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated August 12, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint and granted the defendant a divorce on the ground of plaintiff’s cruel and inhuman treatment and (2) defendant cross-appeals from so much of the said judgment as failed to cancel certain arrears pursuant to a pendente lite support order. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The judgment was amply supported by the evidence. No liability for the payment of arrears of pendente lite support payments is fixed therein, or in any other order. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for divorce, in which the defendant husband counterclaimed for divorce, (1) plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, dated August 12, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint and granted the defendant a divorce on the ground of plaintiff’s cruel and inhuman treatment and (2) defendant cross-appeals from so much of the said judgment as failed to cancel certain arrears pursuant to a pendente lite support order. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The judgment was amply supported by the evidence. No liability for the payment of arrears of pendente lite support payments is fixed therein, or in any other order. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham and Damiani, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 A.D.2d 929, 391 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-v-monroe-nyappdiv-1977.