Monroe v. . Mather-Lovelace
83 N.E. 1125, 190 N.Y. 531, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1448
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur so as to provide that the respondents Ida F. Mather-Lovelace et ah, as administrators, and the respondents A. D. Mather & Co.’s Bank et al., recover separate bills of costs and disbursements granted, without costs. (See 189 N. Y. 563.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monroe v. . Mather-Lovelace, 83 N.E. 1125, 190 N.Y. 531, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1448 (N.Y. 1907).
83 N.E. 1125 (Monroe v. . Mather-Lovelace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.