Monroe v. . Mather-Lovelace

83 N.E. 1125, 190 N.Y. 531, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1448
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 3, 1907·Published

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur so as to provide that the respondents Ida F. Mather-Lovelace et ah, as administrators, and the respondents A. D. Mather & Co.’s Bank et al., recover separate bills of costs and disbursements granted, without costs. (See 189 N. Y. 563.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monroe v. . Mather-Lovelace, 83 N.E. 1125, 190 N.Y. 531, 1907 N.Y. LEXIS 1448 (N.Y. 1907).

83 N.E. 1125 (Monroe v. . Mather-Lovelace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.