Monroe v. Lomenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Monroe v. Lomenzo

40 A.D.2d 727, 336 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3803

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 5, 1972

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 A.D.2d 727 (Monroe v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monroe v. Lomenzo, 40 A.D.2d 727, 336 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3803 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered October 2, 1972 in Albany County, in a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, which dismissed petitioner’s application to compel the Secretary of State to file a certificate of acceptance of her nomination as the Economy Party candidate for the Office of State Senator. The failure to timely file a certificate of acceptance as required by subdivision 15 of section 149-a of the Election Law is, under the present circumstances, a fatal defect and the court has no discretionary power to excuse such defect. (Election Law, § 143, subd. 12; cf. Matter of Bates v. Beyer, 36 A D 2d 735.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Simons, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered October 2, 1972 in Albany County, in a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, which dismissed petitioner’s application to compel the Secretary of State to file a certificate of acceptance of her nomination as the Economy Party candidate for the Office of State Senator. The failure to timely file a certificate of acceptance as required by subdivision 15 of section 149-a of the Election Law is, under the present circumstances, a fatal defect and the court has no discretionary power to excuse such defect. (Election Law, § 143, subd. 12; cf. Matter of Bates v. Beyer, 36 A D 2d 735.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Simons, Kane and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 727, 336 N.Y.S.2d 291, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3803, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-v-lomenzo-nyappdiv-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack