Monroe v. Krippel
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2012
BROTHER YHWH H. MONROE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. NANCY KRIPPEL, Mary Baldwin College Adult Degree Program; MS. LALLON POND, Mary Baldwin College Adult Degree Program; MS. MARION WARD, Mary Baldwin College Adult Degree Program,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00065-sgw)
Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brother Yhwh H. Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, Neil S. Talegaonkar, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brother Yhwh H. Monroe appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Monroe v. Krippel, No. 5:10-cv-00065-sgw (W.D. Va. Aug.
11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monroe v. Krippel (Monroe v. Krippel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.