Monroe v. Krippel

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 26, 2010·No. 10-2012·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2012

BROTHER YHWH H. MONROE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MS. NANCY KRIPPEL, Mary Baldwin College Adult Degree Program; MS. LALLON POND, Mary Baldwin College Adult Degree Program; MS. MARION WARD, Mary Baldwin College Adult Degree Program,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00065-sgw)

Submitted: October 19, 2010 Decided: October 26, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brother Yhwh H. Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, Neil S. Talegaonkar, THOMPSON MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Brother Yhwh H. Monroe appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Monroe v. Krippel, No. 5:10-cv-00065-sgw (W.D. Va. Aug.

11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monroe v. Krippel, (4th Cir. 2010).

Monroe v. Krippel (Monroe v. Krippel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)