Monroe v. Jordan-Monroe

103 A.D.3d 803, 959 N.Y.S.2d 452
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 20, 2013
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 103 A.D.3d 803 (Monroe v. Jordan-Monroe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Monroe v. Jordan-Monroe, 103 A.D.3d 803, 959 N.Y.S.2d 452 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Currier Woods, J.), dated May 16, 2012, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Jean Patsalos, S.M.) dated February 24, 2012, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition for a downward modification of his child support obligation.

Ordered that the order dated May 16, 2012, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

A party seeking a downward modification in child support obligations bears the burden of establishing a change in circumstances warranting a downward modification (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; Rooney v Rooney, 99 AD3d 785, 785 [2012]; Matter of Greene v Holmes, 31 AD3d 760, 762 [2006]). Here, the record supports the Support Magistrate’s determination that the father failed to establish a sufficient change in circumstances. Specifically, the father failed to submit competent medical evidence of his alleged disability (see Matter of Greene v Holmes, 31 AD3d at 762; D’Alesio v D'Alesio, 300 AD2d 340, 341 [2002]; Matter of Gray v Gray, 52 AD3d 1287, 1288 [2008]), and he did not show that he had diligently sought re-employment commensurate with his qualifications and experience (see Matter of Ceballos v Castillo, 85 AD3d 1161, 1163 [2011]; Matter of Greene v Holmes, 31 AD3d at 762; Matter of Yepes v Fichera, 230 AD2d 803, 804 [1996]). Balkin, J.P., Lott, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Nicotra v. Nicotra
139 A.D.3d 1070 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Straker v. Maynard-Straker
133 A.D.3d 865 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
MatterofHoylevHoyle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Hoyle v. Hoyle
121 A.D.3d 1194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A.D.3d 803, 959 N.Y.S.2d 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-v-jordan-monroe-nyappdiv-2013.