Monroe v. City of Richmond

Fourth Circuit

Monroe v. City of Richmond

104 F. App'x 351

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 17, 2004·No. No. 04-1221·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Max Monroe appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action alleging violations of the American with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Monroe v. City of Richmond, No. CA-03-914-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Max Monroe appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil action alleging violations of the American with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Monroe v. City of Richmond, No. CA-03-914-3 (E.D.Va. Feb. 2, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Monroe v. City of Richmond, 104 F. App'x 351 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

104 F. App'x 351 (Monroe v. City of Richmond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related