Monroe v. Bradley
17 F. Cas. 604, 1 Cranch 158
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1803·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
[This was a suit by Thomas Monroe, superintendent of the city, against William Bradley.] In this case, a similar attachment [as in the case against Samuel Harkhess] was issued in the first instance. Both the defendants were ordered into close custody for the term of six days, the present day to be considered as one, and to stand further committed until the costs upon the attachment should be paid.
[See Case No. 9,715.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monroe v. Bradley, 17 F. Cas. 604, 1 Cranch 158 (circtddc 1803).
17 F. Cas. 604 (Monroe v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re William Connors Paint Manufacturing Co.
27 App. D.C. 389 (D.C. Circuit, 1906)
People ex rel. Mosher v. Stowell
9 Abb. N. Cas. 456 (New York Supreme Court, 1879)