Monroe v. Bradley
This text of 17 F. Cas. 604 (Monroe v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This was a suit by Thomas Monroe, superintendent of the city, against William Bradley.] In this case, a similar attachment [as in the case against Samuel Harkhess] was issued in the first instance. Both the defendants were ordered into close custody for the term of six days, the present day to be considered as one, and to stand further committed until the costs upon the attachment should be paid.
[See Case No. 9,715.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. Cas. 604, 1 Cranch 158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-v-bradley-circtddc-1803.