Monroe Hotel Co. v. Estate of Somers

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Monroe Hotel Co. v. Estate of Somers

115 A. 405, 96 N.J.L. 298, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 189

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 21, 1921·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

. The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be' reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion, by the court impossible.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Williams, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Parker, Kalisci-i, Katzenbaci-t, White, Heppeni-leimer, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

. The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be' reversed, the judgment is affirmed, solely because of such division, which renders any opinion, by the court impossible.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Ci-iiee Justice, Swayze, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Williams, JJ. 7.

For reversal—Parker, Kalisci-i, Katzenbaci-t, White, Heppeni-leimer, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 7.

Monroe Hotel Co. v. Estate of Somers, 115 A. 405, 96 N.J.L. 298, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 189 (N.J. 1921).

Pincite

115 A. 405 (Monroe Hotel Co. v. Estate of Somers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related