Monroe Hardware Co. v. Thompson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Monroe Hardware Co. v. Thompson

4 La. App. 85, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 660

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMay 9, 1925

DocketNo. 2304

StatusPublished

This text of 4 La. App. 85 (Monroe Hardware Co. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monroe Hardware Co. v. Thompson, 4 La. App. 85, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 660 (La. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.

CARVEJt, J.

For the reasons given in the decision denying a rehearing in the case of Monroe Hardware Company, Inc., vs. A. Delatte et al., No. 2301 on the docket of this court, it is decreed that the' rehearing asked for in this case he refused, [86]*86with the modification that instead of plaintiff in the call in warranty having the right to execute the judgment herein rendered on depositing $1109.40, it is decreed that it shall have that right only on depositing $1807.97; out of which deposit shall he paid, pro rata, the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in this suit and such' judgments as may be or have been rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in the following suits on the docket of this court in which warrantor herein has been called in warranty, namely:

No. 2301, Monroe Hardware Co., Inc., vs. A. Delatte et al.

No. 2302, Parlor City Lumber. Co., Inc., vs. A. Delatte et al.

No. 2303, C. C. Bell vs A. Delatte et al.

The right is reserved to defendant, Ouachita Valléy Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, to apply for a rehearing.

The judgment herein rendered in favor of Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, against Union Indemnity Gompany shall be credited with the share of the plaintiff herein of the deposit of $1807.97.

Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, defendant, shall pay the costs of this appeal; all other costs to be paid by the warrantor, Union Indemnity Company.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING.

CARVEJt, J.

For the reasons given in the decision denying a rehearing in the case of Monroe Hardware Company, Inc., vs. A. Delatte et al., No. 2301 on the docket of this court, it is decreed that the' rehearing asked for in this case he refused, [86]*86with the modification that instead of plaintiff in the call in warranty having the right to execute the judgment herein rendered on depositing $1109.40, it is decreed that it shall have that right only on depositing $1807.97; out of which deposit shall he paid, pro rata, the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in this suit and such' judgments as may be or have been rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in the following suits on the docket of this court in which warrantor herein has been called in warranty, namely:

No. 2301, Monroe Hardware Co., Inc., vs. A. Delatte et al.

No. 2302, Parlor City Lumber. Co., Inc., vs. A. Delatte et al.

No. 2303, C. C. Bell vs A. Delatte et al.

The right is reserved to defendant, Ouachita Valléy Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, to apply for a rehearing.

The judgment herein rendered in favor of Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, against Union Indemnity Gompany shall be credited with the share of the plaintiff herein of the deposit of $1807.97.

Ouachita Valley Camp No. 10, Woodmen of the World, defendant, shall pay the costs of this appeal; all other costs to be paid by the warrantor, Union Indemnity Company.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 La. App. 85, 1925 La. App. LEXIS 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-hardware-co-v-thompson-lactapp-1925.