Monroe Dewey Partners v. MDR Development, Inc.
159 A.D.2d 949
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1990·No. Appeal No. 2·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied plaintiffs motion for leave to renew its prior summary judgment motion. The renewal was based on evidence existing at the time of the prior motion, and plaintiff failed to provide a valid excuse for not submitting the additional evidence in the original application (see, Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boehm, J. — renewal.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monroe Dewey Partners v. MDR Development, Inc., 159 A.D.2d 949 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
159 A.D.2d 949 (Monroe Dewey Partners v. MDR Development, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Conley v. Central Square School District
255 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Town of Niagara v. City of Niagara Falls
175 A.D.2d 571 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Innovative Chemical Corp. v. Howe Plastics & Chemical Companies, Inc.
164 A.D.2d 965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)