Monroe Brewing Co. v. Bartels
This text of 173 A.D. 917 (Monroe Brewing Co. v. Bartels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Foote and Merrell, JJ., who dissented upon the ground that the resolution electing defendant as president “ for the ensuing year ” and fixing his salary is ambiguous as to the term of such employment and its meaning as intended by the parties should have been submitted to the jury as a question of fact.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.D. 917, 158 N.Y.S. 1123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monroe-brewing-co-v-bartels-nyappdiv-1916.