Monoson v. City of New York
249 A.D. 655, 292 N.Y.S. 942, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5414
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1936·Published
Opinion
Order denying motion of defendant Buckley to dismiss the complaint as against him upon the ground of insufficiency affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. (Banks v. Jacoby & Sons, Inc., 246 [656]*656App. Div. 841.) The appealing defendant may answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monoson v. City of New York, 249 A.D. 655, 292 N.Y.S. 942, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5414 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
249 A.D. 655 (Monoson v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Banks v. A. Jacoby & Sons, Inc.
246 A.D. 841 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)