Monosiet v. Post
4 Mass. 532
This text of 4 Mass. 532 (Monosiet v. Post) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Monosiet v. Post, 4 Mass. 532 (Mass. 1808).
Opinion
This error is fatal. The statute must be strictly pursued. When parties leave the common law for these peculiar remedies, they cannot expect the Court to show them particular favor
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Nay v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.
78 N.E. 547 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Readdy v. Tampa Electric Co.
51 Fla. 289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Giles v. Royal Insurance
60 N.E. 786 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
In re the Arbitration between Kreiss & Hotaling
31 P. 740 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Western Female Seminary v. Blair
1 Disney (Ohio) 370 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1857)
Overseers of the Poor v. Overseers of the Poor
8 N.J.L. 78 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1824)
Jones v. Hacker
5 Mass. 264 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1809)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Mass. 532, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monosiet-v-post-mass-1808.