Monosiet v. Post

4 Mass. 532
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This error is fatal. The statute must be strictly pursued. When parties leave the common law for these peculiar remedies, they cannot expect the Court to show them particular favor

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monosiet v. Post, 4 Mass. 532 (Mass. 1808).

4 Mass. 532 (Monosiet v. Post) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nay v. Boston & Worcester Street Railway Co.
78 N.E. 547 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Readdy v. Tampa Electric Co.
51 Fla. 289 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Giles v. Royal Insurance
60 N.E. 786 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
In re the Arbitration between Kreiss & Hotaling
31 P. 740 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Western Female Seminary v. Blair
1 Disney (Ohio) 370 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1857)
Overseers of the Poor v. Overseers of the Poor
8 N.J.L. 78 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1824)
Jones v. Hacker
5 Mass. 264 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1809)