Monongalia General Hospital v. Division of Corrections

27 Ct. Cl. 238
West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided February 20, 2009·No. CC-07-0341·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Amended Answer.

Claimant seeks payment in the amount of $477.60 for medical services provided to an inmate at Huttonsville Correctional Center. Respondent, in its Amended Answer, admits the validity of the claim in this amount and further states that sufficient funds to pay the claim were not appropriated in its budget during the subject fiscal years.

While the Court believes that this is a claim which in equity and good [239]*239conscience should be paid, the Court further believes that an award cannot be recommended based upon the decision in Airkem Sales and Service, et al. v. Dep’t of Mental Health, 8 Ct. Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monongalia General Hospital v. Division of Corrections, 27 Ct. Cl. 238 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 2009).

27 Ct. Cl. 238 (Monongalia General Hospital v. Division of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Airkem Sales & Service v. Department of Mental Health
8 Ct. Cl. 180 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1971)