Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. Jutte

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. Jutte

59 A. 1119, 210 Pa. 310, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 886

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 31, 1904

DocketAppeal, No. 64

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A. 1119 (Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. Jutte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co. v. Jutte, 59 A. 1119, 210 Pa. 310, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 886 (Pa. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Dean,

In this case the court below refused an injunction to restrain defendant from what, under the authority of the anti-trust act [311]*311of congress and the exposition of that act by the United States supreme court, would have been an interference with interstate commerce; at the same time it did enjoin him from violating his agreement with plaintiff so far as that agreement operated in the state of Pennsylvania. From the first mentioned part of this decree, plaintiffs have brought this appeal. We think the decree was right and have said so as fully as we care to in the opinion handed down this day on appeal by defendant from same decree.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Dean,

In this case the court below refused an injunction to restrain defendant from what, under the authority of the anti-trust act [311]*311of congress and the exposition of that act by the United States supreme court, would have been an interference with interstate commerce; at the same time it did enjoin him from violating his agreement with plaintiff so far as that agreement operated in the state of Pennsylvania. From the first mentioned part of this decree, plaintiffs have brought this appeal. We think the decree was right and have said so as fully as we care to in the opinion handed down this day on appeal by defendant from same decree.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A. 1119, 210 Pa. 310, 1904 Pa. LEXIS 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monongahela-river-consolidated-coal-coke-co-v-jutte-pa-1904.