Monohan v. Bergamini
This text of 24 A.D.2d 522 (Monohan v. Bergamini) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by-defendant, from a judgment of the- Supreme Court entered, upon. the. verdict of a jury in. a. malpractice action. The issues of the. defendant’s alleged malpractice and of proximate, causation of the plaintiff’s injuries, by the. malpractice alleged presented questions, of fact- which properly were, submitted to. [523]*523the jury. The verdict was not against the weight o£ the evidence and, while substantial in amount, was not excessive in relation to the damages sustained. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Taylor, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 A.D.2d 522, 260 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3997, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monohan-v-bergamini-nyappdiv-1965.