Monogios v. Pacific Power & Light Co.

560 P.2d 274, 277 Or. 233, 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1097
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided February 17, 1977·No. No. 10709, SC P-2492·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The controlling issue in this malicious prosecution case is whether the defendant had probable cause to institute criminal proceedings as a matter of law. The law is as stated in Varner v. Hoffer, 267 Or 175, 515 P2d 920 (1973). Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff, we find that the defendant reasonably believed the plaintiff acted in a manner which constitutes the offense of criminal mischief in the second degree.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monogios v. Pacific Power & Light Co., 560 P.2d 274, 277 Or. 233, 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1097 (Or. 1977).

560 P.2d 274 (Monogios v. Pacific Power & Light Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Varner v. Hoffer
515 P.2d 920 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1973)