Monnington v. Cotteral

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Monnington v. Cotteral

1910 OK 241, 110 P. 652, 26 Okla. 817, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 143

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 12, 1910

Docket1142

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1910 OK 241 (Monnington v. Cotteral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Monnington v. Cotteral, 1910 OK 241, 110 P. 652, 26 Okla. 817, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 143 (Okla. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

The petition in error with case-made attached' was filed in this court on the 15th day of October, 1909. No-brief has been prepared, served, and filed by plaintiff in error as-required by rule 7 (20 Okla. vili., 95 Pac. vi.) On May 23, 1910,. motion was made by defendant in error to dismiss the appeal on account of failure to comply with said rule. For the reason set out in Leavitt v. Commercial National Bank, infra, 109 Pac. 71, said motion is sustained. Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WILLIAMS, J.

The petition in error with case-made attached' was filed in this court on the 15th day of October, 1909. No-brief has been prepared, served, and filed by plaintiff in error as-required by rule 7 (20 Okla. vili., 95 Pac. vi.) On May 23, 1910,. motion was made by defendant in error to dismiss the appeal on account of failure to comply with said rule. For the reason set out in Leavitt v. Commercial National Bank, infra, 109 Pac. 71, said motion is sustained. Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1910 OK 241, 110 P. 652, 26 Okla. 817, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monnington-v-cotteral-okla-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack