Monnette v. Malone

395 N.E.2d 493, 60 Ohio St. 2d 5, 14 Ohio Op. 3d 2, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 486
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 5, 1979·No. No. 79-958·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We reverse.

R. C. 3515.09 reads, in pertinent part, as follows:

“Said petition [to contest an election] shall be accompanied by a bond with surety to be approved by the clerk of the appropriate court in a sum sufficient, as determined by him, to pay all costs of the contest.”

The record shows that the $500 in cash was accepted by the clerk’s office and receipted as “Surety Bond for Court Costs,” indicating that the clerk accepted the cash as the equivalent of a bond. Appellees have not shown that they are [6] in any way prejudiced by the clerk’s acceptance of the $500 in cash.

Accordingly, on the facts presented herein, we find that the provisions of R. C. 3515.09 have been complied with.

The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is, therefore, reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for a hearing on the merits of the appellants’ contest petition as expeditiously as possible.

Judgment reversed.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, J J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Monnette v. Malone, 395 N.E.2d 493, 60 Ohio St. 2d 5, 14 Ohio Op. 3d 2, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 486 (Ohio 1979).

395 N.E.2d 493 (Monnette v. Malone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Appeal in the Cty. Ditch known as Spallinger Ditch
2020 Ohio 2671 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2020)
Taft v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
854 N.E.2d 472 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)