Monnette v. Malone
This text of 395 N.E.2d 493 (Monnette v. Malone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse.
R. C. 3515.09 reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
“Said petition [to contest an election] shall be accompanied by a bond with surety to be approved by the clerk of the appropriate court in a sum sufficient, as determined by him, to pay all costs of the contest.”
The record shows that the $500 in cash was accepted by the clerk’s office and receipted as “Surety Bond for Court Costs,” indicating that the clerk accepted the cash as the equivalent of a bond. Appellees have not shown that they are [6]*6in any way prejudiced by the clerk’s acceptance of the $500 in cash.
Accordingly, on the facts presented herein, we find that the provisions of R. C. 3515.09 have been complied with.
The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas is, therefore, reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for a hearing on the merits of the appellants’ contest petition as expeditiously as possible.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
395 N.E.2d 493, 60 Ohio St. 2d 5, 14 Ohio Op. 3d 2, 1979 Ohio LEXIS 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/monnette-v-malone-ohio-1979.