Monnett v. Sturges
25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 384
Opinion
"We agree with the court below. The-limitation in the statute is upon the rate of interest, and not upon the periods of its payment. An agreement to pay ten per cent, per annum, semi-annually, is not an agreement to-pay more than at the rate of ten per cent, per annum. This is well-settled law in Ohio. It is equally well settled that a contract to pay a specified rate of interest, is a contract to-pay interest at that rate until the principal debt is paid, and not merely for the time the note is to run.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Monnett v. Sturges, 25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 384 (Ohio 1874).
25 Ohio St. (N.S.) 384 (Monnett v. Sturges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.